Diagrams of the Path
Visual representations of the fundamental concepts of the Philosophy of the Art of the Path. Tools for understanding the evolution of the ego, consciousness and integral human experience.
“A diagram is worth more than a thousand words when it comes to understanding the relationship between ego and consciousness, between being and non-being.”
The diagrams of the Philosophy of the Art of the Path are not mere illustrations: they are maps of the inner territory. Each one represents a fundamental aspect of human development and its relationship with the cosmos.
The Main Diagrams
Ego-Consciousness Evolution
The development of the human being from the baby (pure consciousness) to the three possible paths: Dominant Ego, One's Own Consciousness, or Development of Being.
Experiencia Humana Integral
The complete cycle of human life: from birth to death, integrating the physical, emotional, mental and spiritual dimensions.
The Four Principles
The two fundamental dualities (Being/Non-Being and Thinking/Non-Thinking) that structure human experience and that, by structural analogy, are also read in the grammar of the cosmos.
How to Use the Diagrams
Contemplation
Do not read them quickly. Sit with each diagram, observe it, let the relationships between elements reveal themselves gradually.
Self-Location
Ask yourself: Where do I find myself in this diagram? At what stage? On what path? Be honest in your assessment.
Reflection
Use the diagrams as a starting point for personal reflection. Write down in your journal the intuitions that arise.
Integration
Connect what you see in the diagrams with your daily experience. Maps are useful only if they help you navigate the real territory.
Connection with the MCMC
These diagrams are not arbitrary. Each one reflects principles that find their parallel in the Multiple-Collapse Cosmological Model. Between the evolution of the ego and cosmic evolution, and between the dimensions of human experience and those of the universe, there is a structural analogy: correspondences of function, not of substance, between two independent works that share a grammar. Neither of the two scales proves the other.