Historical content. This page belongs to the former “solved problems” section. The Tratado de Fundamentos (v35, Jun 2026) does not present these problems as solved: it develops them in full, classifies several results as conditional and keeps seven open fronts. The values of S and the thresholds quoted here may correspond to the earlier formulation. The current classification of each result is in the status of the results.

This page is a translation of the Spanish original. Where they differ, the Spanish text prevails.

The Problem

Cosmological simulations with cold dark matter predict a number of subhalos (satellite galaxies) that exceeds by an order of magnitude what is observed around the Milky Way.

The Discrepancy

~500
Predicted (ΛCDM)
→
~60
Observed (MW)

A factor of ~10× difference that has persisted since the 1990s

Context

CDM Simulations

  • Aquarius, Via Lactea II
  • ~500 subhalos with M > 10⁷ M☉
  • Universal hierarchical structure
  • Excess at all masses

MW Observations

  • ~60 known satellites (2024)
  • Ultra-faints discovered with DES
  • Completeness limited to R < 300 kpc
  • Even so, ~10× factor missing

The MCMC Solution

The MCMC suppresses the formation of low-mass subhalos through the Law of Cronos:

Law of Cronos in Small Halos

The temporal flow depends on the local density:

$$dt_{local} = \frac{dt_{cosmo}}{\sqrt{\Theta(S, \rho)}}$$

In low-mass halos (high relative density), Θ > 1 implies that time passes more slowly. This has two effects:

  • Delayed formation: Small halos form later
  • Reduced accretion: Less cosmic time to grow

Suppression Function

The abundance of subhalos is modified by a factor:

$$N_{MCMC}(M) = N_{CDM}(M) \cdot \exp\left[-\left(\frac{M_c}{M}\right)^\alpha\right]$$

With Mc ≈ 10⁸ M☉ and α ≈ 0.6, derived from the Law of Cronos.

Quantitative Result

Mass Range N (ΛCDM) N (MCMC) N (Observed)
> 10⁹ M☉ ~15 ~12 ~11 (LMC, SMC, Sgr...)
10⁸ - 10⁹ M☉ ~100 ~35 ~30
10⁷ - 10⁸ M☉ ~400 ~20 ~20
Total ~500 ~65 ~60
~45% Suppression
in low-mass subhalos

The MCMC reproduces the observed count without the need for extreme baryonic feedback

Comparison with Other Solutions

ΛCDM Solutions

  • Reionization: Suppresses small halos but not enough
  • SN feedback: Requires extreme efficiency
  • WDM: Introduces a new undetected particle
  • SIDM: Helps but does not fully resolve it

MCMC

  • Suppression emerges from the ontology
  • Requires no new particles
  • Consistent with other observables
  • Verifiable quantitative prediction

Verifiable Predictions

  • Radial distribution: More satellites near the galactic center
  • Luminosity vs mass: Modified relation at M < 10⁸ M☉
  • M31: Similar prediction (~80 satellites expected)
  • Local groups: Universal suppression in similar environments